Numbers: November 2007 Archives

5Min funded, but look at the seed round!

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
I liked 5Min the minute I saw it about five months ago.  I could see that its viral aspects are pretty good, making it a self-marketing web site.  I'm glad to hear that they got their series A and raised $5M.

The above mentioned TechCrunch report has something much more interesting though - the cap table of the company prior to doing the series A round, which I'm showing here right from the TechCrunch report.

Cap table is almost always confidential information for private companies, so having a chance to look at some company's cap table is always interesting.

Founders are Tal, Ran, and Hanan.  As you can see the founders collectively owned 52.1% of the company prior to series A.  I don't know how many seed rounds they had (their site only mentions one "seed" funding of $300K), but it looks like the founders were not good at negotiating the valuation.

As a rule of thumb, founders would be at about 50% (give or take some, depending on negotiation powers) after series A.  Of course if you're a super-hero founder with a solid track record of building companies things are different, but for the first timers that's pretty much what happens.  Series A is usually considered the most diluting round.   So if you're founding a company, you have to either make your valuation high enough or raise less angel funding, so that you're still roughly at about 80% ownership.  Otherwise by the time of series A (and usually a series B is inevitable) there is not much left.  In the case of these guys most probably now that they have got their series A they are at about 9% ownership each (Hanan even less), and by series B they'll be at about 6% (these are just guestimates of course, but that's what an entrepreneur should do anyway and do the math to reverse engineer and see what makes sense).  If we assume a $50M exit for these guys, 6% after all the conversation multiples and other stuff will make a founder about $2-3M.  Not bad, but not impressive either.

About

About this Archive

This page is a archive of entries in the Numbers category from November 2007.

Numbers: October 2007 is the previous archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Numbers: November 2007: Monthly Archives